tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3564934630412318688.post4074970596320489749..comments2023-04-27T11:16:07.867-07:00Comments on deeAuvil: Photoshelter's Lattice needs watermarks!Catherine dee Auvilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15057415492476683336noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3564934630412318688.post-27184137328807941482014-11-07T13:56:51.000-08:002014-11-07T13:56:51.000-08:00@Catherine - send the client a bill directly for u...@Catherine - send the client a bill directly for usage. It has nothing to do with the limitations YOU have placed around the usage. The difference between 1.5 mil and 500K is some monetary compensation which a court of Law will agree. Your agency is mistaken and lazy. YOU make the rules not them. <br /><br />Just so you know - I do make rules. Regardless of who the agency is and I have numerous contracts.<br /><br />Cheers!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3564934630412318688.post-3989875646852091192014-11-07T06:49:48.257-08:002014-11-07T06:49:48.257-08:00There are two issues for me with PS Lattice, the f...There are two issues for me with PS Lattice, the first being a visible ID, the second being content control of the material shown. The symbol could be small and consistent across all images...but PS declines this for now. <br /><br />The second issue is the killer for my agency. When a photographer curates a board that person becomes a gate-holder for content. There is a conflict of interest because that person can restrict what a competitor can include in the board/portfolio. I am not going to have a competitor decide which of my images to show next to his or her images when the marketplace is involved. I addressed this to PS and was assured it would be corrected but it apparently has not. I realize Lattice is essentially in a beta-test mode currently but it is still too buggy for me to invest in it.Hans Halberstadthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312443626227412080noreply@blogger.com